Terms of Use

INTRODUCTION

Use of material presented on this site is subject to the following terms and conditions. You agree to these terms and conditions by accessing this site.

NO LEGAL SERVICES OR ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP

Although this web site may provide general information concerning potential legal issues, it is not a substitute for legal advice from an attorney who knows the facts of your particular situation. You should not and are not authorized to rely on this web site as a source of legal advice. Your use of this site does not create any attorney-client relationship between you and Blanchard & Walker PLLC.

NO WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

Information provided on this web site is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including without limitation warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. Blanchard & Walker PLLC periodically adds, changes, improves, or updates the information and documents on this web site without notice. Blanchard & Walker PLLC assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content of this web site. Your use of this web site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances and under no legal theory shall Blanchard & Walker PLLC or any other party involved in creating, producing, or delivering this web site’s contents be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising from your access to, or use of, this web site.

COPYRIGHT

Blanchard & Walker PLLC claims a copyright in its works presented at this site. Blanchard & Walker PLLC authorizes you to view, copy, download, and print Blanchard & Walker PLLC documents on this web site, subject to the following conditions:

  • The documents may be used solely for personal, noncommercial, and informational purposes;
  • The documents may not be modified;
  • The following copyright notice and permission notice must appear in each document: “© Copyright [year] Blanchard & Walker PLLC. All rights reserved. Documents available from this web site are protected by the copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. All use subject to Conditions of Use set forth at [site_url]/terms.”

COMMERCIAL USE OF Blanchard & Walker PLLC WEB SITE MATERIALS AND SCREEN SHOTS

Reproduction, copying, or redistribution of materials on the Blanchard & Walker PLLC web site for commercial purposes is prohibited without the express written permission of Blanchard & Walker PLLC. To obtain permission to copy portions of this site, please e-mail us and provide the following information in the body of the email:

  • The content you wish to use;
  • Where and how it will be used (for example, a book cover, magazine article, a brochure);
  • Where and how copies will be distributed and to what audience;
  • How many copies will be produced and distributed;
  • When you intend to publish;
  • What other materials will be associated with the Blanchard & Walker PLLC content;
  • Your name, title, company, address, email address, and phone number.

We will evaluate your request and advise you as soon as possible. Blanchard & Walker PLLC reserves the right to refuse permission to copy, distribute, broadcast, or publish any of its copyrighted material, including text and images on our web site.

LINKS TO THIRD PARTY SITES

If you use any links in this web site to web sites not maintained by Blanchard & Walker PLLC, you will leave the Blanchard & Walker PLLC web site. The linked sites are not under the control of Blanchard & Walker PLLC, and Blanchard & Walker PLLC is not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site. Blanchard & Walker PLLC provides these links to you only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply recommendation, approval or endorsement by Blanchard & Walker PLLC of the site.

FROM THE BLOG
  • Blanchard & Walker PLLC : Workers on a “Day-Rate” Pay System are Still Owed Overtime Pay. October 31, 2019

    “Day-rate” regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) are very clear: “day-rate” workers” are entitled to additional pay for hours worked over forty in a week. The Department of Labor Regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 778.112, requires that when employees paid on a day-rate work more than forty hours in a week, their hourly rate is calculated by totaling all money received in the workweek and dividing by the total hours actually worked in that week. Such employees are then entitled to an overtime half-time premium for all hours worked over forty that week.

    In one recently-filed Blanchard & Walker case, a client worked in construction and demolition of merchandizing fixtures for big box stores, such as AutoZone and Meijer, but she was paid only a straight day rate for each day worked.  She worked more than ten hours a day, six or seven days a week without the overtime pay required under the law. Unfortunately, this type of payroll fraud is very common.

    The U.S. Secretary of Labor filed a similar case in Michigan last year, and the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan easily disposed of the restaurant owner’s defenses and granted Summary Judgment for the DOL for “day-rate” restaurant workers:

    Although the FLSA does not require employers to compensate their employees on an hourly basis, “the overtime compensation due to employees must be computed on the basis of the hourly rate derived therefrom, and therefore, it is necessary to compute the regular hourly rate of such employees during each workweek.” 29 C.F.R. § 778.109. The “regular rate” will necessarily fluctuate when an employee’s hours vary. 29 C.F.R. § 778.108. In this case, Defendants paid their employees a flat day rate, regardless of the hours worked. The Secretary calculated overtime due by performing a mathematical computation to determine the “regular rate.” The Secretary used the total remuneration as the dividend, and the hours worked as the divisor, to determine the “regular rate” as the quotient. Using this calculation, the Secretary determined that Defendants failed to pay overtime at one and a half times the regular rate for any of their employees. Defendants have failed to show that the Secretary’s calculations do not comport with the strictures of the FLSA. Accordingly, Defendants’ pay practices violate the FLSA’s requirement for overtime compensation under 29 U.S.C. § 207(a) and the Secretary is entitled to summary judgment.

    Acosta v. Min & Kim Inc., No. 15-CV-14310, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9507, at *18-19 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 22, 2018)

    Unfortunately, many employers violate this wage law hoping they won’t get caught on this type of payroll fraud…  and even if they do get caught, hoping that it will cost less to settle a lawsuit and pay off one plaintiff rather than changing their system and paying all workers what they are legally owed. 

    At Blanchard & Walker, we fight back for the overtime right of day-rate workers. In one recently-filed FLSA collective action in the Eastern District of Michigan, the lead plaintiff came forward with allegations for herself and other similarly situated employees who also worked weeks, sometimes sixty or seventy hours, but only received a flat “day-rate” for each day worked.  Blanchard & Walker lawyers continue to investigate and talk to day-rate workers across transportation, service, and construction industries.

  • Blanchard & Walker PLLC: Federal Lawsuit Alleges “Day-Rate” Workers Deprived of Overtime Pay for 70+ Hour Weeks
    Display Assembly Workers Deprived of Overtime Pay

    “Day-rate” regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) are clear: “day-rate workers,” such as retail display assembly workers, are owed an additional half-time pay for hours worked over 40 in a week.

    Blanchard & Walker PLLC Payroll Fraud Case Pending: Plaintiff worked doing construction and demolition of merchandizing fixtures for DisplayMax aka FixtureMax, servicing big box stores such as AutoZone and Meijer. Even though she worked more than ten hours a day, six or seven days a week, she was paid only a straight day-rate for each day worked—without the overtime pay required by law. “Day-rate” regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) are very clear: “day-rate” workers are entitled to an additional half-time pay for hours worked over forty in a week. Plaintiff in the federal court lawsuit alleges she is owed the FLSA-mandated half-time premium for all overtime hours, and brought the case so that all similarly situated employees of DisplayMax and FixtureMax will have an opportunity to opt-in and recover the overtime pay legally owed to them. Blanchard & Walker lawyers are currently taking calls with impacted workers to investigate the scope of the pay practices at issue.

    Bonus reading: The Case for Good Jobs

  • Blanchard & Walker Law PLLC: Ruling Provides Warning for Mandatory Handbook Restrictions January 31, 2019

    Administrative ruling sends a warning shot for overreaching and oppressive employment contracts.

    Blanchard & Walker clients win in case tried under the National Labor Relations Act. Trial verdict provides a warning for employers seeking to impose workplace communication restrictions.

    The Motor City Pawn Brokers ruling confirms that oppressive handbook requirements banning everything from communications with former employees to social media postings violate the National Labor Relations Act, and firing people for (more…)