In the UIA Class Action Complaint, Blanchard & Walker clients allege Michigan’s Unemployment Insurance Agency is illegally assessing “overpayments” and initiating collection activity against a broad class of UIA claimants who relied on pandemic unemployment assistance in 2020 and 2021. The lawsuit seeks injunctive and other relief to recover for unlawful actions that violate the due process rights of UI claimants.
LATEST UPDATE 7/18/2022: The Court of Claims has ruled! Preliminary Injunction Granted! – because Plaintiffs are likely to prevail on due process claims related to unauthorized Agency collection before UIA Claimants have had a hearing and opportunity to appeal the Agency’s late reversals of benefits. But nothing is that simple… and the Michigan UIA continues to fight back.
UPDATE 3/08/2022: In recent development, the Agency has announced a temporary halt on new collections, until May 7, 2022. Current collections do not appear to be suspended. We continue to fight against unlawful collections activities. Although we hope for the best, recent reporting has suggested the Unemployment Agency will not be able to make good on the waivers as promised.
RECENT MEDIA COVERAGE
- editorial-accountability-still-lacking-unemployment-agency
- state-michigan-still-seeking-job-aid-clawbacks-despite-vow-prioritize-waivers
- michigan-unemployment-agency-overpaid-benefits-lawsuit
- uia-questions-pause-unemployment-overpayment-collections
- judge-michigan-unemployment-agency-overpaid
If you may be affected by UIA Overpayment Collection take the survey here
Follow us on facebook for case updates @michiganemploymentlawyers
RECENT FILINGS IN UIA OVERPAYMENT CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT:
Court of Claims June 13, 2022 Opinion and Order on Preliminary Injunction and Agency Motion to Dismiss. Preliminary Injunction Granted! – because Plaintiffs are likely to prevail on due process claims related to unauthorized Agency collection before UIA Claimants have had a hearing and opportunity to appeal the Agency’s late reversals of benefits.
But nothing is that simple… and the Michigan UIA continues to fight back. The Agency has filed a motion seeking to limit the scope of the injunction to only the named Plaintiffs (and asking the Court to allow continued collection against everyone else).
- Unemployment Agency Motion for Reconsideration on scope of Preliminary Injunction
Meanwhile, Plaintiffs have filed an Application for Leave to Appeal the portions of the Court of Claims’ Order dismissing Plaintiffs’ additional claims for Agency illegal collections more than a year after benefits, and for failing to provide an administrative process to review for whether overpayments should be waived based on Agency error.
- Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to Appeal to the Michigan Court of Appeals
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Pleadings:
- March 10, 2022 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- March 31, 2022 State Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- April 4, 2022 Carpenters and Bricklayers Union Brief in Support of Preliminary Injunction
- April 5, 2022, State Planning Body and Michigan League for Public Policy Brief in Support of Preliminary Injunction
- April 5, 2022 Plaintiffs and UIA Claimants Reply in Further Support of Preliminary Injunction to Suspend Collection Activities.
Michigan Unemployment Agency Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Lawsuit Pleadings:
- March 14, 2022, Unemployment Agency Motion to Dismiss Complaint
- April 7, 2022, Plaintiffs and UIA Claimants’ Response and Counter-Request for Summary Disposition
- April 14, 2022, UIA Reply Brief seeking dismissal
If you may be affected by UIA Overpayment Collection take the survey here
Follow us on facebook for case updates @michiganemploymentlawyers
The lawsuit alleges three practices of the Agency are unlawful:
- UI claimants who received “Monetary Redeterminations” retroactively reducing or cancelling UI benefits more than a year after the original Monetary Determination.
- UI claimants who were assessed overpayments and suffered collection activity before Agency Review for whether the overpayments were a result of agency error.
- UI claimants who are facing collection notices, garnishments, and other collection activity while protest and appeals remain pending.
The full complaint in Saunders v. Unemployment Insurance Agency is available here. Potentially hundreds of thousands of Michiganders are impacted. If you believe that you may be impacted by one or more of these practices, you may complete a short survey to provide your information. Then we can reach out if your assistance is needed.
*WE ARE NOT ABLE TO RESPOND TO INDIVIDUAL INQUIRIES*
*WE ARE NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL ADVICE OR REPRESENTATION*
- Legal Services of South Central Michigan (https://lsscm.org/)
- Legal Aid of Western Michigan (https://lawestmi.org/)
- Lakeshore Legal Aid (Southeast Michigan) (https://lakeshorelegalaid.org/)
- Legal Services of Northern Michigan (http://lsnm.org/)
- Sugar Law Center (statewide) (https://www.sugarlaw.org/)
You may consider filing a report regarding your UIA experience to the Attorney General’s office here.
If you would like to notify Governor Whitmer’s office of your UIA experience, you may do so here.
Please follow us on Facebook @michiganemploymentlawyers for updates on this matter.